Respuestas
Respuesta dada por:
1
Japan has been a terrible week because of earthquakes. There are territories that throughout history have suffered such disasters for being in a strip of known risk. Other parts of the world, however, are free from this phenomenon, although affected by other natural calamities. Huge floods, long periods of total drought, pests that destroy crops, hurricanes and typhoons ...
The International Red Cross has informed that in the last 10 years has reduced the number of deaths --aún huge--, but has increased the homeless. The average is set at 250 million! per year. Injured, disabled, people who lose their homes or their livelihoods.
Concerned --ya times maniáticamente-- obsessed by food that could harm us, by smoke from a cigarette someone smokes beyond the proximity of any antenna, traffic noise not usually think of these millions of victims of each year for any reasons we can call natural. Because nature is often aggressive --not only is the humana-- species. But the consequences of many of these disasters could be mitigated, if not avoided, if there were more resources for rescue, if the infrastructure were adequate.
We should avoid easy generalization believe that natural disasters occur especially in poor countries. By the fact of being poor. No. Europe is very small, therefore it is logical that there are many more natural disasters in the vast expanses African, Asian, American. Underdevelopment has nothing to do with the appearance of these shocks of nature. Japan is a demonstration, as it was years ago San Francisco, as evolved as destroyed.
What matters is that --inevitables-- forecasting and disaster protection technology exists in risk areas. And in these fields if the rich countries have to cooperate.
Preguntas similares
hace 6 años
hace 6 años
hace 9 años
hace 9 años
hace 9 años
hace 9 años
hace 9 años