Respuestas
Respuesta:
Counterarguments:
Graffiti is a primitive habit, an activity typical of culturally inferior peoples.
It is considered a symptom of mental imbalance or imbalance, something abnormal.
It is a childish manifestation, a sample of immaturity or deficiency of some people.
It is an act of vandalism or of an antisocial nature, the work of criminals, marginal or asocial beings.
Its contents are objectionable, not accepted by the official canons of expression.
It generates citizen insecurity, abandonment or lack of protection.
It causes disorders in the development of the daily activity of cities.
It is an attack on cultural heritage, especially monumental.
It generates visual pollution and is an attack on the urban environment.
Arguments in favor:
It is a means of therapeutic expression, a form of intellectual relief.
It is a cultural or social revulsion that can bring about a renewal and improvement of the current social model.
It is a means of preventing social or individual explosions, avoiding other types of violent acts.
It allows, from the marginal sphere, the development of an unofficial channel of opinion and information, free from official tendencies.
It is a democratic bulwark, a popular practice associated with free initiative.
It is emerging as a means or tool for personal self-knowledge.
Its development as an artistic medium culturally enriches the urban public space.
Through their practice, prominent individuals have emotional or identifying ties with the environment or territory they inhabit.
Explicación: