Respuestas
Respuesta dada por:
1
At the heart of contemporary civilization is modern technology and that technology is intensive ciencio. (Nunez, 1994). Technological development is altering everything from economic and political to the psychological, the intimate lives of people, consumption patterns, human reproduction, life extension and its limits with death. The technology is pervasive in the contemporary world. Such omnipresence is a historic result after which several relevant social processes that explain the current social status of science and technology are revealed. These social processes are:
The Scientific Revolution of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries that gave rise to modern science and unleashed processes of institutionalization and professionalization of scientific practice and conceptual and methodological developments that have significant effects on science and its relationship with society in the three following centuries.Industrial revolutions and profound technological changes that accompany them. Changes leading to a growing approach to science to confuse both in the second half of the twentieth century through the Scientific and Technological Revolution. The technological paradigm that unfolds over the past three decades has been particularly intensive in consumption of knowledge and impressive in terms of its social scope.The rise of capitalism and its planetary domain, then claimed the crisis of European socialism. The consolidation of modern science and capitalism are two historically parallel processes and interconnected as will be shown later. The globalization of capitalism is associated not only to the productive forces and production relations that provide its foundation, but consumption patterns he promotes and process development models advocated, to which he attributes a universality that its apologists considered unanswerable.The emergence, affirmation and crisis of the world system of socialism. Both for their efforts and successes in the field of science and technology, for the answers that their progress demanded of capitalism in the context of the cold war, the existence of socialism has been a key to explain the scientific development social fact and technology of this century.The planetary divide between developed and underdeveloped countries. The world's wealth is highly concentrated in a group of countries which gives them enormous power in international relations. That power rests in the domain of science and technology, even more concentrated than wealth. This polarization has enormous consequences for any country that attempts to develop science and technology.These processes refer us to the European events that take place mainly between the fifteenth and nineteenth centuries. In that period unfold in Europe increasingly interconnected three great revolutionary processes: The Bourgeois Revolution, the Scientific Revolution and the Industrial Revolution (Furtado, 1979). We comment some of its consequences.
The rise of the bourgeoisie meant promoting a class urged to accelerate the process of accumulation in the productive forces, generating instrumental rationality oriented accumulation and needed to erase the culture and ideology that crystallized the Middle Ages.
The Scientific Revolution of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries that gave rise to modern science and unleashed processes of institutionalization and professionalization of scientific practice and conceptual and methodological developments that have significant effects on science and its relationship with society in the three following centuries.Industrial revolutions and profound technological changes that accompany them. Changes leading to a growing approach to science to confuse both in the second half of the twentieth century through the Scientific and Technological Revolution. The technological paradigm that unfolds over the past three decades has been particularly intensive in consumption of knowledge and impressive in terms of its social scope.The rise of capitalism and its planetary domain, then claimed the crisis of European socialism. The consolidation of modern science and capitalism are two historically parallel processes and interconnected as will be shown later. The globalization of capitalism is associated not only to the productive forces and production relations that provide its foundation, but consumption patterns he promotes and process development models advocated, to which he attributes a universality that its apologists considered unanswerable.The emergence, affirmation and crisis of the world system of socialism. Both for their efforts and successes in the field of science and technology, for the answers that their progress demanded of capitalism in the context of the cold war, the existence of socialism has been a key to explain the scientific development social fact and technology of this century.The planetary divide between developed and underdeveloped countries. The world's wealth is highly concentrated in a group of countries which gives them enormous power in international relations. That power rests in the domain of science and technology, even more concentrated than wealth. This polarization has enormous consequences for any country that attempts to develop science and technology.These processes refer us to the European events that take place mainly between the fifteenth and nineteenth centuries. In that period unfold in Europe increasingly interconnected three great revolutionary processes: The Bourgeois Revolution, the Scientific Revolution and the Industrial Revolution (Furtado, 1979). We comment some of its consequences.
The rise of the bourgeoisie meant promoting a class urged to accelerate the process of accumulation in the productive forces, generating instrumental rationality oriented accumulation and needed to erase the culture and ideology that crystallized the Middle Ages.
Preguntas similares
hace 6 años
hace 6 años
hace 6 años
hace 9 años
hace 9 años